Format comparison
SVG vs JPG
SVG describes shapes as math; JPG compresses photographs as pixels. They are not interchangeable — SVG is wrong for photos, JPG is wrong for scalable logos.
Decision table
| Feature | SVG | JPG |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vector | Lossy raster |
| Transparency | Yes | No |
| Best for | Logos / icons | Photos |
| Scaling | Perfect | Breaks when enlarged |
| Typical size | Small for simple art | Small for photos |
| Photo quality | Not suitable | Excellent tradeoff |
| Web support | Modern browsers | Universal |
Choose SVG when…
- Scalable logos and icons
- UI illustrations
- Print-to-billboard vector needs
Choose JPG when…
- Camera photos
- Social photo uploads
- Any continuous-tone photography
Verdict
Use SVG for crisp brand/UI graphics. Use JPG for photographs. Convert SVG→JPG only for flattened previews where vectors are unsupported.
Convert between them
Jump straight into a private browser converter — files are not uploaded to a server.
Keep exploring this topic
Stay inside the SVG / JPG knowledge graph — sibling comparisons, best-format guides, and converters — not generic homepage links.
Format hubs & guides
Related comparisons
Best format guides